Is it so wrong if someone chooses no to advertise her baby and/or pregnancy to the whole world?
I, for one, absolutely don't think so!
But clearly, for the masses over in Hollywood, who seem to have nothing better to do with their time, it is a crime punishable by stoning!
Yesterday, a tweet showed up on my timeline talking about how Kyla Pratt has a "secret baby". So, me being the curious cat I am, I clicked on the link to find out more.
And this is what I came across:
According to popular online gossip site, child star Kyla Pratt just dropped a bombshell on national TV!So what?! How is this anyone's business anyway?The actress ... ... confirmed baby rumours which had apparently been doing the rounds and revealed that she has an almost 1-year-old baby girl after secretly giving birth a year ago.
[source]
I see no reason for her to publicly announce the existence of a baby in her life. But alas, that's not what this is about, I'm more interested in blogs going crazy about her having a "secret baby".
Does the fact that she's well in her mid-20's count for nothing?!
If she wants to have a baby, then let her, I don't see how this is anyone's business. Claiming that she has a secret baby is basically saying that she shouldn't have hidden the fact that she was pregnant or even the obvious fact that she's now old enough to bear children. And well within her rights to do so.
Maybe the fact that Vuzu is still airing old episodes of One on One, where Ms Pratt is in her early teens, is what warrants the urge to publish the story on their website.
So I guess everyone and anyone who has ever been on TV owes it to the world to share whatever that is personal to them? I doubt it.
Anyway, I'm off it.
:p
